Auditing Section Research Summaries Space

A Database of Auditing Research - Building Bridges with Practice

This is a public Custom Hive  public

research summary

    Accelerated filing deadlines, internal controls, and...
    research summary posted October 20, 2015 by Jennifer M Mueller-Phillips, tagged 01.0 Standard Setting, 01.07 Impact of SEC Actions, 12.0 Accountants’ Reports and Reporting, 12.03 Restatements 
    221 Views
    Title:
    Accelerated filing deadlines, internal controls, and financial statement quality: The case of originating misstatements.
    Practical Implications:

    Given the significant amount of concern regarding the reliability of financial statement reporting under new filing deadlines (movement from 90 days to 75 days in 2003 and then to 60 days in 2006), the authors provide evidence which shows the concern was valid but only temporarily. The authors use originated misstatements to indicate the beginning of a misstatement, showing that accelerated filers experienced higher likelihood of misstatements after the first acceleration, however large accelerated filers did not experience such a change in response to the second acceleration. Additionally, implementation of SOX appears to have increased reliability with fewer originated misstatements upon implementation.

    Citation:

    Boland, C. M., S. N. Bronson, C. E. Hogan. 2015. Accelerated filing deadlines, internal controls, and financial statement quality: The case of originating misstatements. Accounting Horizons 29 (3) 297-331.

    Keywords:
    Accelerated filing, financial statement restatements, Sarbanes-Oxley Act, filing lags, internal controls
    Purpose of the Study:

    The authors investigate whether Government regulationspecifically through changes in filing deadlines and implementation of the Sarbanes Oxley Act (SOX)influence the origination of financial statement misstatements. They specifically focus on the origination of misstatements to determine if firms sacrificed relevance and reliability to comply with accelerated filing dates.

    Design/Method/ Approach:

    The analyses use a sample of 17,216 firm-year observations from 12/15/2002 to 12/14/2007. The authors run a regression analysis predicting the likelihood of a restatement for accelerated filers and large accelerated filers relative to non-accelerated filers. The model incorporates controls for other known determinants of changes in likelihood of restatement.

    Findings:

    The authors find:

    • Accelerated filers had a higher likelihood of a misstatement following the filing deadline shift from 90 to 75 days.
    • Accelerated filers had a reduced likelihood of a misstatement following implementation of SOX.
    • Large accelerated filers did not experience a change in likelihood of a misstatement following the filing deadline shift from 75 to 60 days.

    The results suggest that the concerns of filers and their auditors regarding the potential for lower-quality information resulting from accelerated filing was valid, although only temporarily. In the long run, companies were able to file reports in a timelier manner without a corresponding increase in the likelihood of misstatement.

    Category:
    Accountants' Reporting, Standard Setting
    Sub-category:
    Impact of SEC Actions, Restatements