TwT

Teaching with Technology

This is a public blog  publicRSS

Posts

  • Richard E Lillie
    Competency-based education is all the rage: What is it?9
    blog entry posted April 7, 2015 by Richard E Lillie, tagged research, teaching 

    In his blog "OLDaily," Stephen Downes referenced an article published in The Tennessean (4/07/2015) titled Competency-based education is all the rage:  What is it?  The article was written by Kimberly K. Estep, Chancellor of WGU Tennessee (Western Governors University).

     

    Estep provides a great definition of competency-based education (CBE).  She provides an interesting example of how CBE works at WGU Tennessee.

     

    I'm interested in finding out whether your college or university has adopted any type of CBE programs, particularly for accounting.  If you have adopted a CBE for accounting or are considering doing this, please REPLY to this posting telling us about the program.

     

    Best wishes,

     

    Rick Lillie

     

    Rick Lillie, MAS, Ed.D., CPA (Retired)

    Associate Professor of Accounting, Emeritus

    CSUSB, CBPA, Department of Accounting & Finance

    5500 University Parkway, JB-547

    San Bernardino, CA.  92407-2397

     

    Email:  rlillie@csusb.edu

    Telephone:  (909) 537-5726

    Skype (Username):  ricklillie

     

     

    Recent Comments (3 of 9)

  • Richard E Lillie
    Emerging Technologies in Distance Education -- Outstanding...106
    blog entry last edited May 22, 2012 by Richard E Lillie, tagged research 

    In July, 2010 AU Press (Athabasca University, Canada) published a book that I think you will find is an excellent resource for ideas about using technology in teaching and learning.  The book entitled Emerging Technologies in Distance Education is edited by George Veletsianos.

    AU Press makes the book available for free in Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) format.  You may download the entire publication or selected chapters.

    This book is worth exploring.  It may not turn you into a "pro from Dover" (to draw on the line from the movie Mash).  However, it should help you better understand how to use technology when you design course materials and share them with your students.

    Enjoy.

    Rick Lillie (Cal State, San Bernardino)

    Emerging Technologies in Distance Education

    Recent Comments (3 of 106)

  • Richard E Lillie
    Teaching with Technology -- A Learned Art1
    blog entry posted August 17, 2010 by Richard E Lillie 

    "Your students will often know about new computer tools before you or even your computer center people do, and they will expect you to know about them and use them."

    Source:  What They Didn't Teach You in Graduate School (2008).  Gray, Paul and David Drew, 70, Stylus, 978-57922-264-2.

    Flash Content requires JavaScript to be enabled and the Flash player to be installed.
    Get Adobe Flash player

    Recent Comments (1 of 1)

  • Richard E Lillie
    Jane Hart's Top 100 Tools for Learning 20152
    blog entry posted October 1, 2015 by Richard E Lillie, tagged technology, technology tools 

    Each year, Jane Hart, founder of  C4LPT compiles her list of Top 100 Tools for Learning.  The 2015 list is now available.  I have followed Hart's work for many years and have always found the annual list to be a great resource.  I have incorporated several of the tools into my course designs.  I especially like tools like Zoom.us.

    Zoom.us is a cloud-based, video-conferencing service.  It's great for collaboration.  Anyone can use it for free.  A "Pro" account is very inexpensive.  Many universities now have campus subscriptions.  LMS systems like Canvas integrate Zoom.us as an "app" with the LMS.

    Click the image below to access SlideShare version of the 2015 List.  Click your way through the presentation.  I'm sure you will recognize many teaching/learning tool resources.  You may find something new and exciting.


    Enjoy,

     

    Recent Comments (2 of 2)

  • Richard E Lillie
    Dark Side of the Internet: Students can find almost...1
    blog entry posted December 15, 2015 by Richard E Lillie, tagged research, teaching, technology 

    For many years, I have taught accounting courses in face-to-face, blended, and fully online formats.  Of the three instructional methods, I thoroughly enjoy teaching courses in the fully online format.  My personal logo reflects the challenge of doing this.

    While undergraduate courses tend to be somewhat "nuts-n-bolts" focused, graduate courses (both MBA and Master's of Accountancy) are broader in scope, require a lot of writing and presentations, include case studies, team collaboration and online research.  For both undergraduate and graduate courses, the Internet is an important support resource for the teaching-learning process.  The Internet can be either a good resource or a not-so-good resource depending on intent with which it is used.

    During recent academic terms, I have noticed a significant increase in the use of what I call the "Dark Side of the Internet."  By this I mean the increasing student use of the Internet as a source for finding solutions to class assignments, solutions to exam questions, solutions for case studies, and engaging others who will write papers for students for a fee.  While unethical, this type of behavior does not seem to cause even a "blink of an eye" for students who gravitate toward "Dark Side" activity.  This trend includes students completing courses in all three course delivery formats (i.e., face-to-face, blended, and fully online).

    I am amazed when a student turns in an assignment prepared by someone else and considers the assignment to be his(her) own work.  The fact that the submitted assignment is NOT his(her) own work does not seem to be a matter of concern.  After all, the student paid a fee for a service.

    I am updating an online graduate course that I am teaching during upcoming Spring 2016.  I plan to include a few short case studies to be used for team projects.  Course topics are interesting, challenging, and intense.  The projects are well-suited for the team and case study formats.  The cases are good examples of the old adage "more heads may be better than one."  Team discussion and research are integral parts of preparing a case solution.

    I have been searching for appropriate case studies for the course.  Each time I find an interesting case study, the first thing I do is perform an online search for the case study title. This is where things get interesting very quickly.

    Over and over again, the title of the case study pops up on the screen with a URL that links to a website that promises a "high quality" solution for the case study with the claim that an "A" grade is only a click away!  How could a student whether undergraduate or graduate resist this kind of temptation.

    Below are statements posted on the home page of a "case writing service" offering "personalized case solutions for you."  Of course, "personalized case solutions" cost money.

    • "We offer personalized solutions to any business case, individually written by.....graduates from top North American universities."
    • "We guarantee your cases will be written individually which means there is no chance of plagiarism.  We provide answers....at a reasonable price!"
    • "We pride ourselves in quality work.  Having completed over 1,000...business cases, as well as 500+ case solutions from other organizations, you are guaranteed a quality solution."
    • "Please browse out site and do not hesitate to contact us with any questions.  We will gladly solve your case and please remember, an 'A' grade is only a click away!"

    Students find these "Internet resources" pretty easily.  A quick search using almost any search engine turns up links like the ones shown below.

    While I thoroughly enjoy the challenge of teaching in the online format, I am both challenged and frustrated by students who feel that cheating and unethical behavior are acceptable.  In a recent online class, I read short essay responses that were word-for-word from the author's suggested solution for a textbook end-of-chapter ethics question.  What are the odds of a student or team coming up with an exact word-for-word answer?  Astronomical?

    I recently came across an interesting blog post on a website called "Online Schools Center."  The focus of the post was "How Students Cheat Online."  I especially liked a comment in the post that addressed my concern about being both challenged and frustrated by students who feel that cheating and unethical behavior is acceptable.  Below is the comment.

    As I update course materials for my upcoming Spring 2016 course, I will write about ways that I build into my course design that I "hope" will motivate students not to engage in Dark Side activities.

    Some methods that I have built into my course designs have worked pretty well.  Unfortunately, others have failed.  I have always heard that "failure" is the first step toward success.  If this is true, then I'm certainly headed in the right direction.

    Tell me what you think about this posting.  I hope my comments will start a conversation on a topic that we all face one way or another.

    Best wishes,

     

     

     

     

    Recent Comments (1 of 1)

  • Richard E Lillie
    HAPPY NEW YEAR (2016)
    blog entry last edited January 4, 2016 by Richard E Lillie 

    Happy New Year (2016) to readers of the Teaching with Technology (TwT) blog.  I hope you enjoy commentaries posted to the TwT blog page.  Throughout 2016, I encourage you to contribute to the discussion regarding teaching with technology.

    Best wishes for a safe, prosperous, joyous 2016,

  • Richard E Lillie
    Online Test-Takers Feel Anti-Cheating Software's Uneasy...1
    blog entry last edited April 9, 2015 by Richard E Lillie, tagged teaching, technology, technology tools 

    Anyone who has taught a blended or online class where online testing is used, has had to deal with the issue of cheating, whether real or imagined.  I teach a lot of online classes and thoroughly enjoy the challenge of this teaching-learning experience.

    I used an online proctoring service with one online course.  Student feedback was so-so.  I have used Zoom.us, a cloud-based, incredible video-conferencing tool to proctor students completing an online exam.  Student reaction to being watched through Zoom.us was more positive than the online proctoring service.

    Whether good or bad, online proctoring is still very much an evolving process.

    This post shares a story from The New York Times (Technology, April 5, 2015) titled Online Test-Takers Feel Anti-Cheating Software’s Uneasy Glare.

    What do you think?  Is this an appropriate way to proctor an online exam test taker?

    If you have had experience with this, please REPLY to this post with comments about your experience.

    Rick Lillie

    Recent Comments (1 of 1)

  • Richard E Lillie
    2015 Survey of Faculty Attitudes on Technology
    blog entry posted October 14, 2015 by Richard E Lillie, tagged research, teaching, technology 

    The Inside Higher Education Daily News Update (10/14/2015) includes a link to its 2015 Survey of Faculty Attitudes on Technology.  Below is IHE's description of the survey conducted by IHE and Gallup.

    Inside Higher Ed survey explores how faculty members and administrators feel about the quality of online education, the integrity of plagiarism-detection software, the expansion of MOOC-to-degree programs, the growth in the cost of course materials and more. In many cases, instructors are skeptical.

    Click here to download a free copy of the survey study.

    Have a great day,

     

  • Richard E Lillie
    The "Book Trilogy" Becomes a "Quartet"
    blog entry last edited September 7, 2015 by Richard E Lillie, tagged research, teaching, technology 

    With the rapid change to both the U.S. and global economies, I searched for ways to make the change more understandable for my accounting students, whether they be undergraduate or graduate level.  The initial result was creation of what I called the "Book Trilogy."

    As depicted in the diagram below, the "Book Trilogy" included The World is Flat by Thomas L. Friedman, The Myth of the Rational Market by Justin Fox, and That Used to be Us by Thomas L. Friedman and Michael Mandelbaum.  I asked students to read the books in the indicated sequence.  We discussed the books both during and outside of classes.

    I selected each book for its focus, clarity of writing style, and the unique way the story is told.  I wanted resources that were readable and understandable.  I did not want resources designed to "blow the reader out the door."

    Of the three books, I was particularly impressed with the way Justin Fox, a former editorial director of Harvard Business Review and now a columnist for Bloomberg View, told the story of development of modern finance and how its impact came close to bringing the U.S. and other economies to their knees.  Rather than burying the reader with mathematics and Finance jargon, Fox chronicled the rise of rational market theory by helping the reader "look through the eyes" of the scholars who constructed what is now referred to as "Modern Finance."

    I placed Fox's book in the middle of the trilogy because it bridges the gap between theory and practice of globalization, economics, and "Modern Finance."  Each book in the trilogy takes an innovative approach to telling its story.

    Recently, I read Economix, How Our Economy Works (And Doesn't Work) in Words and Pictures, by Michael Goodwin with illustration by Dan E. Burr.  A comment in the Miami Herald described Economix as

    This witty and elegant volume takes on a number of complex issues--in this case, economics, history and finance--and makes them comprehensible for mere mortals.

     I was fascinated by the way Goodwin's content and commentary were presented in a cartoon-like format.  Goodwin and Burr wrote an easy to read, insightful, entertaining story about our current economy and current economic problems. 

    Timothy Guinnane,Yale University, commented that

    Economix is a lively, cheerfully opinionated romp through the historical and intellectual foundations of our current economy and our current economic problems.  Goodwin has a knack for distilling complex ideas and events in ways that invite the reader to follow the big picture without losing track of what actually happened.  Any reader wondering how our economy got to where it is today will find this a refreshing overview.

    I enjoy coming up with innovative ways to invigorate and challenge the teaching-learning experience of my students.  Student response to the "Book Triology" has been very positive.  I wonder what they will think of my expanding the "Book Trilogy" into a "Book Quartet" (i.e., a series of four books)?

    I love discussion.  I would appreciate your feedback comments about the above commentary.  Please let me hear from you soon.

     

  • Richard E Lillie
    If Content is King, It's Time to Overthrow the Monarchy!
    blog entry last edited April 24, 2015 by Richard E Lillie, tagged research, teaching, technology 

    This post shares a blog posting by Will Thalheimer titled If Content is King, It's Time to Overthrow the Monarchy!  Click the article title to access Will's blog posting.

    Will's objective is to convince you that you're teaching too much information (i.e., you're cramming too much content into your courses).  With the every growing body of accounting knowledge, rules, regulations, methods, and techniques, I would find it difficult to believe that accounting educators are not doing this.  As the old saying goes, "It's the nature of the beast."  We have so much material to cover and so little time to get the job done.

    A driving force pushing us to cover more is content tested on the CPA Examination.  We want to make sure our students are prepared for the CPA Exam.

    I like Will's commentaries about instructional design.  They are practical and easily implemented.

    In this blog posting, Will briefly mentions the "Learning and Forgetting Curves."  This concept suggests that if you imagine your learners going up the learning curve and then down the forgetting curve, you'll notice that they end up where they started--that the learning has largely failed in producing benefits.  To learn more about "Learning and Foregetting Curves," click the URL link below to view a short YouTube presentation by Will Thalheimer.  Runtime is approximately 12 minutes.



    A great resource provided by the Association for Talent Development (ATD), formerly ASTD, is a blog titled Science of Learning Blog.  Click the blog title.  When the web page displays, bookmark for page for future access.

    What do you think of Will's discussion of Learning Curves/Forgetting Curves?  Post a reply to this blog posting.  Share your thoughts.

    Have a great day,